Claims are open. The settlement website now lists a claim deadline of December 1, 2026 (online, or
postmarked if mailed), replacing the September 3, 2026 date published earlier. The exclusion and objection
deadline, now listed as November 2, 2026, has passed. The settlement website says the Final Fairness
Hearing is scheduled for January 28, 2027, and the settlement has not been approved yet. No payment date
had been announced as of November 7, 2026.
Status
Claims Open
final fairness hearing January 28, 2027 · exclusion and objection deadlines have passed
Claim Deadline
December 1, 2026
online, or postmarked if mailed · moved from September 3, 2026
Estimated Payout
$50, plus up to $5,300
the $50 stacks with the documented tiers · $300 ordinary and $5,000 extraordinary losses · or take two years of monitoring instead of the $50
Proof Required
Yes
documentation for both loss tiers · have the notice you were sent when you file online
The settlement website now lists new dates: a claim deadline of December 1, 2026, exclusion and objection
deadlines of November 2, 2026, and a Final Fairness Hearing on January 28, 2027. Earlier settlement
information gave September 3, 2026 for both the claim deadline and the final approval hearing, and August 4,
2026 for exclusions and objections. The website does not give a reason for the change.
Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare has agreed
to resolve John Doe v. Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare, Case No. 24-2-00502-24, in the Superior Court
of the State of Washington for the County of Okanogan. Notice has gone out, the exclusion and objection
window has closed, and the claim portal and settlement documents are live on the official settlement
website.
Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare denies wrongdoing and liability and disagrees with the claims and contentions
in the lawsuit. No court has found that it did anything wrong. Under the settlement the provider has agreed
to cover attorneys' fees and expenses, the costs of notice and administration, and a service award for the
class representative.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare is a behavioral health provider based in Omak, Washington, serving Okanogan
County in the north-central part of the state.
According to the settlement materials, the provider discovered a data incident in May 2024 involving
unauthorized access to systems holding sensitive personal information about its clients. The unauthorized
access is described as having occurred from May 13, 2024 until May 15, 2024, and 26,429 individuals were
affected.
The information involved included names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's
license and other identification numbers, health insurance information, and medical information including
diagnosis and treatment details.
That last category is why this breach sits in a different weight class from a retailer's. Diagnosis and
treatment records from a behavioral health provider are among the most sensitive documents a person has, and
the exposure of them is a distinct harm from financial identity theft — one that credit monitoring does not
address and that no remedy can undo, because unlike a card number a diagnosis cannot be reissued. The
lawsuit alleged the provider failed to adequately protect that information; those are allegations, and the
Court has made no finding of wrongdoing.
The Settlement Class covers the individuals whose personal information was involved in the May 2024 incident
— the 26,429 people the provider identified and notified.
Membership turns on whether your information was caught up in the breach, not on where you live now. The
provider serves Okanogan County, so in practice most class members are current or former Washington
residents, but a former client who has since moved out of state is not excluded for that reason. The notice
sent by the settlement administrator is the practical marker of who is in.
The benefit structure here is worth reading carefully, because it is more generous in shape than most data
breach settlements of this size:
- Documented ordinary losses — up to $300 per class member. The routine out-of-pocket costs of dealing with a breach: credit reports, freezes and unfreezes, postage, phone charges, mileage, monitoring you paid for yourself.
- Documented extraordinary losses — up to $5,000 per class member, for actual identity theft or fraud traced to the incident.
- Two years of CyEx Medical Shield Complete credit monitoring, or instead a $50 Alternative Cash Payment.
The part most people get wrong on settlements like this one is the election. On the great majority of data
breach settlements, the flat cash payment is an either-or against the documented tier: take the cash and you
give up the receipts route. Here it is not. The settlement materials state that the $50 Alternative Cash
Payment may be claimed in addition to reimbursement for ordinary and extraordinary losses.
What you actually choose between is the $50 and the two years of monitoring — the cash is offered in lieu of
the monitoring, not in lieu of the loss tiers. So a class member with documentation can claim $300 in
ordinary losses, $5,000 in extraordinary losses, and the $50 on top, for a theoretical maximum of $5,350.
A class member with no losses to document is choosing between $50 in cash now and two years of medical
identity monitoring — and given that the exposed data here includes diagnosis and treatment information,
medical monitoring is a more relevant product than a standard credit product would be.
All of this assumes valid documentation and is subject to the Court granting final approval.
Both loss tiers require documentation, and it has to tie the loss to this incident. For ordinary losses that
means receipts, statements, invoices for a monitoring service you bought yourself, or records of postage and
mileage. For extraordinary losses it means evidence of the fraud or identity theft itself — statements
showing the fraudulent activity, correspondence with a bank or creditor, a police or agency report where one
exists. Anything already reimbursed by a bank, insurer or employer cannot be claimed again.
The $50 Alternative Cash Payment and the credit monitoring require no documentation of loss. Filing online,
though, is normally gated on the identifier printed on the notice the administrator sent you, and that
identifier is itself a form of proof — someone who never received the notice cannot supply it. Find your
notice before you start. If you cannot locate it, use the contact route on the official settlement website
to reach the administrator, Simpluris, before the December 1, 2026 deadline.
December 1, 2026. The settlement website says claim forms must be submitted online by that date or, if
mailed, postmarked no later than that date. It does not specify a cut-off time or a timezone. The deadline
was moved from September 3, 2026, the date given in the earlier settlement information.
The deadline to request exclusion or to object, now listed on the settlement website as November 2, 2026
(it was August 4, 2026 in the earlier settlement information), has passed. Anyone who did not
opt out is in the class and will be bound by the release if the Court approves the settlement, whether or
not they file a claim — which means that for people still reading, filing is the only remaining way to get
anything out of it.
File on the official settlement website,
Okanogan Data Settlement,
which is the only court-authorized site for this case. Because the $50 stacks with the loss tiers here, do
not treat the form as a single either-or choice: claim the documented losses you can support, then make the
separate election between the $50 and the two years of monitoring.
Upload your supporting records with the form. A documented claim submitted without documentation is the most
common reason this kind of claim is reduced to nothing.
The settlement website says the Final Fairness Hearing is scheduled for January 28, 2027; it had been set
for September 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. At the hearing the Court will consider whether to approve the settlement
and rule on fees and the service award. Hearing dates can move without further notice being mailed.
A hearing taking place is not the same as approval being granted, and approval is not the same as payments
being released. No payment date had been announced as of November 7, 2026.
Can I take the $50 cash payment and still claim documented losses?
Yes, and that makes this settlement unusual. The published settlement materials state that the $50
Alternative Cash Payment may be claimed in addition to reimbursement for Ordinary and Extraordinary
Losses. On most data breach settlements the flat cash payment is an either-or against the documented
tier; here it is not. The one thing that is a genuine choice is the $50 against two years of credit
monitoring — the alternative cash payment is offered in lieu of the monitoring, so you pick one of
those two and can claim documented losses either way.
What is the difference between ordinary and extraordinary losses here?
They are two separate documented tiers with two separate ceilings. Ordinary losses are capped at $300
per class member and cover the routine out-of-pocket costs of responding to a breach — credit
reports and freezes, postage, phone charges, mileage, monitoring you paid for yourself.
Extraordinary losses are capped at $5,000 per class member and cover actual, documented identity
theft or fraud traced to the incident. Both require documentation. Added to the $50 alternative cash
payment, the theoretical maximum on this settlement is $5,350.
Were the Okanogan settlement deadlines changed?
The settlement website now lists a claim deadline of December 1, 2026, exclusion and objection deadlines of November 2, 2026, and a Final Fairness Hearing on January 28, 2027. Earlier settlement information gave September 3, 2026 as both the claim deadline and the final approval hearing date, and August 4, 2026 as the exclusion and objection deadline. The website does not give a reason for the change, and the Court has not yet decided whether to approve the settlement.
Why is this breach considered more sensitive than a typical one?
Because of what a behavioral health provider records. The information involved included names,
addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license and other identification
numbers, health insurance information and medical information including diagnosis and treatment
details. Diagnosis and treatment information from a behavioral health setting is among the most
sensitive category of record a person has, and unlike a card number it cannot be reissued or revoked
once it is out. That is a separate harm from financial identity theft and it is not addressed by
credit monitoring.
I moved out of Washington. Am I still covered?
Membership turns on whether your information was involved in the incident, not on where you live now.
Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare is based in Omak, Washington and serves Okanogan County, so in
practice most class members are current or former Washington residents — but a former patient who
has since moved is not excluded for that reason. The notice sent by the settlement administrator is
the practical marker of membership, and anyone who believes they were affected but received no
notice should use the contact route on the official settlement website before the deadline.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Settlement Amount
No total fund stated
benefits are defined per class member rather than out of a disclosed common fund
Case Title
John Doe v. Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare
Case Number
24-2-00502-24
Court
Superior Court of Washington, County of Okanogan
Final Approval Hearing
January 28, 2027
Rescheduled from September 3, 2026 · date may change without further notice
Administrator
Simpluris